For example, in Thoughts and Reflections, one student wrote:
"English is known as an international language. However, I think English is just English, and I feel that the owner is the Native English speaker. I study English because I want to be able to communicate with natvie English speakers for many reasons. If every county has their mixed English such as Tinglish, Chinglish, Spanglish, etc., it will be very chaotic because if we want to use English with Chinese people, we have to learn Chinglish, not English."
This comment is very insightful and important. This comment goes to the heart of the debate of English as an International Language (EIL). Is there a universal standard? Are native speakers the authority? If every culture develops their own form of English, then what is the point of having an International Language?
Question: How can we balance this issue? How do we meet the needs for international people to communicate clearly with language, and meanwhile meet the needs for people to express their own cultural identity?
I hope this student's comments will inspire some ideas and new comments and questions to think about. Aj. M